BLD FLASH 9525
SOURCE MATERIAL DATED: 8/95
¦
 
 
 
               PSF/400: CPU CONSIDERATIONS FOR TCP/IP ATTACHMENT
 
 As  of  June  30, 1995, OS/400 V3R1 and V3R6 Print Services Facility/400 will
 provide direct support for TCP/IP attached printers including 3130,3160  3935
 and  3900 AFCCU models and 7913 attached models such as the 3112, 3116, 3912,
 3916, 3816, 3930 and 4028. Support for 7913 attachment  of  the  IPDS  impact
 models 4230, 6408/6412, 4224/4234 will also be provided.
 
 A  complete  understanding  of the ramifications of moving from SNA or twinax
 attached printers to TCP/IP attachments should be gained before  moving  cus-
 tomers in the direction of TCP/IP attached printer solutions.
 
 Although  the ability to route print using TCP/IP provides additional printer
 sharing capabilities and attachment flexibility, the testing in our labs  has
 shown  that TCP/IP in the AS/400 environment does not drive printers as effi-
 ciently as SNA token ring or twinax.  For customer environments where CPU cy-
 cles are in short supply, CPU utilization should be reviewed  as  part  of  a
 system assurance or pre-installtion planning procedure.
 
 The  performance  evaluation figures below should be used only to help under-
 stand the CPU utilization effects of various attachment methods and  not  for
 printer performance comparisons. As of 9/95 there is work in progress both in
 PSF/400  and  TCP/IP for OS/400 development groups to improve the performance
 and CPU utilization when using TCP/IP.  These performance  measurements  were
 as  of 8/95 and part of your TCP/IP printing with PSF/400 implementation plan
 should be to contact Software Support to receive the  latest  maintenance  to
 PSF/400  and  TCP/IP  for  OS/400 to be sure to receive any fixes that may be
 available.
 
 
 
 DIRECT TCP/IP ATTACHMENT (SUPPORTED BY AFCCU PRINTERS)
 ______________________________________________________
 
 
 The figures shown below were tabulated in the following test environment:
 
   AS/400: D60              LAN: Dedicated 16M  T.R.     MTU:  4096
   OS/400: V3R1             Line Max Frame Size: 8156    Traces: Off
   Print While Convert = *NO
 
   PRINTER HARDWARE: 3130
 
   PRINT JOBS: The print jobs used in this performance evaluation are de-
   scribed in the "AFP: Catalog of Performance Reference Pages". Summary
   descriptions are also provided below.
 
     TXT32K - Simple Text reference page with 32,000 characters.
     TXT08K - Simple Text reference page with  8,000 characters.
     RAST87 - Simple Raster reference page with 87 square inches of IM1
              image.  Total bytes per page, 65,253.
 
 Case name  Printer   ATTACH/TYPE  PPM   KB/S   CPU Util.   CPU Sec./Page
  TXT08K    3130         TCP/IP     30    4.5     0.4%         0.008
  TXT08K    3130          SNA       30    4.5     0.2%         0.005
  TXT32K    3130         TCP/IP     30   18.1     1.5%         0.030
  TXT32K    3130          SNA       30   18.2     1.0%         0.019
  RAST87    3130         TCP/IP     17  177.1    12.6%         0.445
  RAST87    3130          SNA       21  220.9     8.3%         0.235
 
 NOTES: 1. The 3130GA printer is a ship-level 3130 used at 240-pel
 
 
 
 
 
 
           density.
 
        2. The 3130M printer was a printer with test microcode required
           to use TCP/IP send buffers larger than 8K.  Contact hardware
           support, to obtain the applicable microcode upgrade for your
           specific AFCCU printer.
 
        3. Print File conversion requires CPU seconds and causes utiliza-
           tions in addition to what's shown for printing, but is not af-
           fected by attachment types and variables.  The total processor
           load for printing these pages is higher than the printing-only
           results shown here.  If the total  CPU Utilization  was calcu-
           lated for Print While Convert= *YES (configured in the Printer
           Device Description)  it is estimated the figures would reflect
           approximately 20-30% differences between TCP/IP and SNA vs the
           50% shown in many of the test cases here.
        4. The performance (PPM) degredation shown in the RAST87 test
           case is believed to be primarily caused by limitations in the
           AFCCU printer control unit.
 
 
 
 
 
 TCP/IP ATTACH VIA 7913
 ______________________
 
 
 Some  TCP/IP  7913-3930  measurements were made, to understand the effects of
 7913 limitations and to compare the same  device  attached  via  twinax.  The
 print environment was as follows:
 
   AS/400: D60              LAN: Dedicated 4M  T.R.          MTU: 1440
   OS/400: V3R1             Line Max Frame Size: 4060        Traces: Off
   Print While Convert = *NO         Print Buffer: 256 bytes
    * Print buffer used for direct twinax attach was 1024 bytes
 
 Case name  Printer   ATTACH/TYPE  PPM   KB/S   CPU Util.   CPU Sec./Page
  TXT08K    3930      7913 / coax
  TXT08K    3930      7913/twinax
  TXT08K    3930         Twinax
  TXT32K    3930      7913 / coax   15    9.0     1.7%         0.050
  TXT32K    3930      7913/twinax   15    9.0     1.7%         0.050
  TXT32K    3930         Twinax     16    9.4      .6%         0.023
  RAST87    3930      7913 / coax    3   33.3     5.9%         0.827
  RAST87    3930      7913/twinax    3   33.3     5.9%         0.799
  RAST87    3930         Twinax      3   31.3     2.0%         0.400
 
 NOTES: 1. The larger buffer size used for direct twinax attachment
           should not affect processor seconds per page, although
           printer throughput might be affected.
        2. The limited throughput in these test cases was primarily
           caused by the 3930 print engine.
        3. The different buffer sizes used for the 7913 attachment is
           due to a permanent restriction that currently exists in the
           7913.
 
 These  numbers  were  all gathered using an AS/400 Model D60.  Evaluations on
 your specific model of AS/400 can be made using the IBM AS/400  System  Hand-
 book  (GA19-5486). The following factors should be considered when evaluating
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 whether the CPU utilization impact of TCP/IP attachment of AFP printers could
 affect performance or throughput in your environment.
 
 o   Relative CPU performance of your specific AS/400 Model.
 
 o   The  number of printers and/or the pages per minute of the printer(s) be-
     ing driven by PSF/400.
 
 o   Other applications running on the AS/400 and/or the current CPU  utiliza-
     tion levels.
 
 o   System Tuning.
 
 
 
 3900 DUPLEX TCP/IP TOKEN RING ATTACHED
 ______________________________________
 
 
   AS/400: F60              LAN: Dedicated 4M  T.R.      MTU:  4060
   OS/400: V3R1             Line Max Frame Size: 4060    Traces: Off
   Print While Convert = *NO
 
 
 Case name  Printer   ATTACH/TYPE  PPM   KB/S   CPU Util.   CPU Sec./Page
  TXT32K    3900       TCP/IP      300   176.8    6.9%         0.014
  RAST87    3900       TCP/IP      300   204.4    8.3%         0.254
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$EOM